Bastows Divorce Solicitors
Bastows Divorce Solicitors
PROPERTY AND COHABITATIONBack

# Printer Friendly Page

Separation and Divorce

Divorce Settlements

Children

Cohabitation

 

» Property
» Child Maintenance
» Child Support Agency
» Parental Responsibility

Pre-Nuptial Agreements

Civil Partnership Agreements

Mediation

Domestic Violence

Life after Divorce

Wills

Change of Name

   
   
PROPERTY AND COHABITATION
 
PROPERTY AND COHABITATION
 
TIRED OF BEING A VICTIM?
 
FREE 20 mins consultation
 
PROPERTY AND COHABITATION
 
UNMARRIED WITH CHILDREN?
 
PROPERTY AND COHABITATION
 
PROPERTY AND COHABITATION
 
WHEN DID YOU LAST SEE YOUR CHILDREN?
 
PROPERTY AND COHABITATION
 
PROPERTY AND COHABITATION
 
FREE 20 mins consultation

PROPERTY AND COHABITATION

CAPITAL ASSETS – COHABITATION SEPARATION

The end of a relationship creates emotional turmoil and the rules applied by the Courts in determining asset division are technical. The Court has no obligation to consider what is fair and reasonable.

 

PROPERTY CASE LAW – COHABITATION RIGHTS

The rules have developed on a case by case basis and legal advice on cohabitation property disputes is based on an estimation of what the Court is likely to do.

 

PROPERTY DISPUTE – COMMON LAW WIFE – COMMON LAW MAN AND WIFE

When cohabitation breaks down there is often a dispute as to who owns the home the parties have shared and in what proportion. There is no cohabitation law. The matter will be governed by the law of contract which has roots which stretch back over 600 years.

 

PROPERTY OWNED BY ONE COHABITEE – LIVING TOGETHER AGREEMENT

The Court will consider:

1. Has the “owner” of the asset made a legal contract to pass or share ownership to the cohabitee?

If not:

2. Does “equity” make intervention appropriate?

 

LEGAL CONTRACT

If a legal contract exists, one party can apply to the Courts for an order compelling the other party to comply with the terms of the contract or pay compensation for failure to do so.

 

WHAT IS A LEGAL CONTRACT?

A contract arises where there is agreement, complying with any prescribed formalities (for example, statute requires that any contract relating to land be in writing or evidenced in writing), between two, or more, people to enter into legal relations for “good consideration”.

 

GOOD CONSIDERATION

Each party must either make a financial payment or do something to his detriment. This does not include gifts and promises.

 

NO LEGAL CONTRACT

If a legal contract to share or transfer the property has not been made the Court can still intervene if:

  1. There is an understanding between the owner and the cohabitee seeking a share of the property.
     
  2. The cohabitee applying for a share in the property has acted in reliance of that understanding to his/her detriment. (Constructive trust)

 

PROPERTY OWNED JOINTLY

If the property is owned jointly, the first consideration is whether there is a document stating how the parties own the property.

If such a document exists (Express trust), it is almost certainly binding. It is imperative that couples purchasing a property together are advised by their conveyancing solicitor as to the alternative forms of ownership.

 

PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISPUTE – NO COHABITATION RIGHTS

If there is no written evidence as to respective shares in the property the Court will consider:

  1. The parties’ actions. What did they agree? What were their intentions?
     
  2. If no discussions took place what agreement can be implied from their actions?
     
  3. Who purchased the property and in what proportions? (Resulting trust)
     
  4. Who paid the outgoings on the property and for any improvements/repairs?
     
  5. Why was the property bought and who lived there?

 

WHAT THE COURT WILL NOT INCLUDE – COHABITATION UK

  1. Contributions towards bringing up children.
     
  2. Payment towards household expenses.

This is harsh, but payments made directly towards the mortgage can infer that the owner intended the cohabitee to acquire a share in the property. Payment for food and utility bills can be made for many reasons, a lodger, for example, would make such payments. It is therefore not possible to conclude that the owner intended the cohabitee to obtain a share in his/her property because he/she contributed towards their joint living expenses.

 

LEGAL ADVICE ON SPLITTING UP – COHABITATION SEPARATION

This is a complex area of law, and the costs of litigation are expensive. It is important to receive comprehensive legal advice on your rights when cohabitation breaks down.

 
Back
 
 

Please contact us if you would like advice or further information on divorce or any related matter:
E-MAIL enquiries@bsdivorcesolicitors.co.uk

02380 455366 

Text Sizes

size1 size2 size3

 

# TOP