COOKIES: This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue we'll assume that you are happy to receive cookies from this website. [ More info ] [ Clear Cookies ]
ACCEPT
BASTOWS
BEFORE YOU TAKE ACTION
TAKE ADVICE
0845 680 6045
DIVORCE SOLICITORS

Lynne Bastow is a legal blogger well worth a read for anyone who has any interest in divorce law.
Raven Wilson

Maintenance McFarlane v McFarlane (2009 EWHC891)

2009

 

Mrs McFarlane made an application to the Court to increase her maintenance of £250,000 per annum and to capitalise her maintenance claim. The couple had three children, aged twenty, eighteen and thirteen. Since the parties had separated, Mr McFarlane had remarried and his second wife was also a successful partner at his accountancy firm. They had a son who was three years old and Mr McFarlane’s career had continued to blossom.

In 2007, one year after the House of Lord’s judgement, Mrs McFarlane the first issued her application for increased maintenance. The Judge, Mr Justice Clark, made an order to fund an eight year clean break which Mr McFarlane husband would need to fund from income he and his second wife had earned since the divorce.

The award was as follows: from the 25th June 2007 Mr McFarlane had to pay the first Mrs. McFarlane:
40% of his net income up to £750,000,
20% of his net income up to £1,000,000,
and 10% of his net income above that.
This would continue until the 31st May 2015, when Mr McFarlane retires.

The judge considered that Mrs. McFarlane would then receive an unearned tax-free income of approximately £350,000. The award was backdated by two years, so that Mr McFarlane would have to pay the first Mrs McFarlane and additional £200,000 immediately. If the parties had divorced in Europe then there would have been no ongoing maintenance claim by Mrs McFarlane.

This award appears unfair to Mr McFarlane, who albeit has a highly successful career, must have an exceptional talent and be extremely dedicated in order to amass such an income, as must his second wife. The first Mrs McFarlane does not work and has an income, as the judges pointed out, in excess of her needs.

It is not surprising that England and Wales are regarded as the divorce capital of the world.

 
Back
Divorce and Money
 

» Legal Aid Withdrawn 2013
» Prenuptial Agreements 2010
» Self Help Imerman 2010
» McFarlane v McFarlane 2009
» Capital - Miller v Miller 2006
» McFarlane v McFarlane 2006
» Pensions - Martin-Dye v Martin-Dye 2006

Cohabitation
Child Maintenance
   
FIXED FEE LEGAL ADVICE
0845 680 6045
eBooks
The Little Book of Divorce
 
The Little Book of Divorce Dilemmas
 
Text Sizes
size1 size2 size3

Please contact us if you would like advice or further information on divorce or any related matter:

0845 680 6045
The Little Book of Divorce The Little Book of Divorce Dilemmas eBooks
Available to DOWNLOAD on Amazon

WHAT OUR CLIENTS SAY ABOUT US

"Thank you for your help.. I feel so much better after speaking to you" Mrs R

"Many thanks for all your help and patience" Mrs E

"Just to say thank you for dealing with my divorce and all your hard work, time and advice along the way" Mr H

10 Mistakes People
Make on Separation
TOP